

A minority government, new stakeholders, and priorities that are still taking shape: reflections on best practices shared during a discussion among public affairs experts.
Two weeks after the October 5, 2026, provincial election, the new government is beginning to take form. Cabinet appointments are being finalized, new faces are emerging, and government priorities are becoming clearer by the day. For organizations, this period raises some very important questions. Who should you speak to? When? And how do you stand out when everyone is trying to get noticed?
To help answer these questions, Casacom brought together leaders from a wide range of sectors for a breakfast discussion on October 20, the day before the swearing-in of the new Cabinet. As Director, Corporate Communications and Government Relations at Casacom, I had the pleasure of participating in the conversation alongside my colleague Alice Bergeron, Director, Corporate Communications and Public Affairs. The discussion was moderated by Catherine Mounier-Desrochers, Senior Director, Corporate Communications and Public Affairs.
Between the three of us, we have experienced more than seven elections and government transitions, both provincially and federally. We have experienced these moments both from the inside, having worked in political offices, and now from the outside, advising organizations navigating government relations. Here are the key takeaways we shared with those who joined us.
A Context That Changes the Dynamic
Quebec had not experienced a minority government since 2012. The decisions made and relationships established today will influence organizations' ability to make their voices heard for years to come. In this context, it is no longer enough to approach government with occasional requests. Organizations need to position themselves as partners that can help advance government priorities.
Reading the Signals: How Priorities Take Shape
Several key documents and moments can help organizations understand the direction of a new government:
The lesson we wanted to convey is simple: aligning with the government's priorities matters, even when they are not explicitly stated.
Weaving Your Network: Much More Than a Meeting with the Minister
The instinct is often the same: to meet with the minister as quickly as possible and introduce your organization and its priorities. These meetings are important, but they are not enough to build a lasting relationship. Decisions are shaped around the minister, and many people contribute to that process:
The right question is not simply "Who is the decision-maker?" but rather "Who influences, who recommends, and who decides?" Organizations that cultivate relationships at multiple levels are better positioned to withstand cabinet reshuffles, changes in chiefs of staff, and unexpected developments.
Best Practices for Building Lasting Relationships
Throughout our discussion, we identified five essential habits for organizations looking to build strong relationships with the new government.
Timing: When Have You Missed the Boat?
It is never too late to establish a relationship, whether with the new government or with the newly elected representatives now sitting in the National Assembly. Acting early is important, but consistency matters just as much. The first 100 days are significant, as ministers are often expected to quickly outline and begin advancing their priorities. That said, influence is built over time. It is also important to remember that every organization operates according to its own timeline and strategic priorities.
Building for the Long Term
Perhaps the most valuable advice shared during the panel was also the simplest: at its core, public affairs is about human relationships. Organizations should build connections with political offices, ministries, and elected officials before they need anything, and then maintain those relationships over time.
Organizations that are well known to political teams enjoy tangible advantages. They may receive advance notice of consultations or be invited to share their perspective because they are recognized as trusted partners with a strong understanding of realities on the ground. At a minimum, they develop a valuable network within their sector. At best, they are well positioned to help shape public policy discussions and advance their priorities.
At a moment when a new government is defining its vision, the most important question might not be, "What should I ask for?" but rather, "How can I contribute?"